The Resource Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies
Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies
Resource Information
The item Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation.This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
Resource Information
The item Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation.
This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
- Summary
- In this CFE Opinion Statement, the CFE ECJ Task Force comments on the ECJ decision in État luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) of 25 November 2021. This decision brings further clarification on the rights of information holders in respect of cross-border exchange of information, as well as on the concept of “foreseeable relevance”
- Language
- eng
- Label
- Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies
- Title
- Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies
- Language
- eng
- Summary
- In this CFE Opinion Statement, the CFE ECJ Task Force comments on the ECJ decision in État luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) of 25 November 2021. This decision brings further clarification on the rights of information holders in respect of cross-border exchange of information, as well as on the concept of “foreseeable relevance”
- Citation source
- In: European taxation. - Amsterdam. - Vol. 62 (2022), no. 5 ; p. 219-223
- http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
-
- Kofler, G.W
- García Prats, F.A
- Haslehner, W.C
- Heydt, V
- Kemmeren, E.C.C.M
- Lang, M
- Nogueira, J.F. Pinto
- HJI Panayi, C
- Raventós-Calvo, S
- Richelle, I
- Rust, A
- Shiers, R
- Geographic coverage
-
- European Union
- Europe
- Language note
- English
- http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
-
- exchange of information
- ECJ case law
- DAC
- taxpayer rights
- EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
- Label
- Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies
- Label
- Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies
Embed
Settings
Select options that apply then copy and paste the RDF/HTML data fragment to include in your application
Embed this data in a secure (HTTPS) page:
Layout options:
Include data citation:
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.library.ibfd.org/portal/Opinion-Statement-ECJ-TF-12022-on-the-ECJ/jfn_bQSXKTs/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.library.ibfd.org/portal/Opinion-Statement-ECJ-TF-12022-on-the-ECJ/jfn_bQSXKTs/">Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.library.ibfd.org/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="https://link.library.ibfd.org/">International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation</a></span></span></span></span></div>
Note: Adjust the width and height settings defined in the RDF/HTML code fragment to best match your requirements
Preview
Cite Data - Experimental
Data Citation of the Item Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies
Copy and paste the following RDF/HTML data fragment to cite this resource
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.library.ibfd.org/portal/Opinion-Statement-ECJ-TF-12022-on-the-ECJ/jfn_bQSXKTs/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.library.ibfd.org/portal/Opinion-Statement-ECJ-TF-12022-on-the-ECJ/jfn_bQSXKTs/">Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the conditions for information requests and taxpayer remedies</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.library.ibfd.org/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="https://link.library.ibfd.org/">International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation</a></span></span></span></span></div>
